We have been asked many times and in many different ways what our thoughts were on the election over the last few months. We must tell you, we look at this purely through an economic lens. There are many social issues that come and go as time moves forward, but our job is to understand the economy and that is what we like to focus on.
For months we have been saying the markets are usually what we look at in trying to understand the elections. However, because of the Coronavirus, it has been much more difficult to sort out economic gain vs government stimulus. Still, we think the S&P 500 gets it right more than not.
We have noted before that the S&P 500 has been a useful indicator and has predicted 20 of the past 23 presidential election winners. If stocks are higher in the three-month period before the election, the incumbent party has won, and if stocks are lower, the opposition party has won. Yesterday’s 1.2 percent rally placed stocks slightly above their August 3rd level. We will close this indicator at 4pm today. In 2016, stocks were down in the three-month period before the election and were at odds with the polling. This was disregarded as noise. Similar arguments are being made today. We believe this indicator has worked historically because the stock market reflects the current and future outlook of the US economy, which translates into the current voter sentiment. The indicator did not work in 1956, 1968, and 1980 where other issues than the economy mattered in the elections, and that could be the case today. But at the very least, this indicator seems to suggest the race is closer than the consensus is expecting.
EITHER THE CONSENSUS IS WRONG OR STOCKS ARE NOT A VERY GOOD PREDICTOR OF THIS ELECTION
I copied the headline above straight from our October 18, 2016 report. At the time, stocks were down 2.5%, and, if the historical pattern held, stocks were indicating what seemed unbelievable at the time: that Trump would beat Clinton. Like today, investors believed that “other” factors were more important for stocks than the election, and the expectation that the Fed would begin to raise interest rates was weighing on stocks. Today’s debate is similar in that the explanation for stocks being up is due to “other” factors like monetary and fiscal policy stimulus coupled with the promise of vaccine approvals coming online.
We should know the results over the next few days and see if once again the S&P 500 was able to predict the election outcome. Please call or email us with any questions you may have.
Source: Strategas
Sincerely,
Fortem Financial
(760) 206-8500
team@fortemfin.com