On Sunday April 5th, President Trump tweeted that trade negotiations with China were moving too slowly; he announced a tariff increase (from 10% to 25%) on $200 billion of Chinese imports effective Friday April 10th and announced his intention to initiate a 25% tariff on an additional $320 billion of imports from China. China, while offering no details, indicated its intention to reciprocate. The sudden change in outlook for a trade agreement sent the markets tumbling last week: the Nasdaq declined -3.03% followed by Russell 2000® Index (-2.54%), S&P 500® Index (-2.18%), and Dow Jones Industrial Average (-2.12%); the losses for the S&P 500® were the worst since the December 2018 selloff.
Last week, the U.S. trade negotiators reportedly told President Trump that China was backing away from some key commitments to a developing agreement; the Chinese may have interpreted President Trump’s criticism of the Federal Reserve as an indication that the U.S. economy was weakening and that President Trump needed a trade pact sooner-rather-than-later. Details are in short supply; but, given the high stakes, the pressure tactics on both countries are not unexpected. Two days of negotiations in Washington DC concluded Friday with both sides indicating that the discussions were “constructive.” Many companies have responded to the trade turmoil by taking steps to reduce the impact of higher tariffs by stockpiling and sourcing supplies from other countries. Most executives such as JP Morgan’s CEO Jamie Dimon still believe a trade agreement will be reached; on Wednesday, he put the odds of an agreement at 80% stating, “Now we have this whole kind of little bump in the road” adding, “Sometimes his [President Trump’s] tweets don’t pan out to be as bad.”
On the corporate front, Occidental Petroleum raised its cash offer for Anadarko which caused Chevron to drop out of the bidding. The much-hyped IPO of Uber debuted Friday at $45, priced at the low end of the projected range; the stock lost 7.62% on its first day of trading.
Earnings season is nearing an end; results continue to exceed analysts’ expectations.
Uncertainty is always a nemesis for investors seeking predictability. Last week’s volatility was a step back even as year-to-date returns remain strong. Commentary on the progress of trade negotiations will likely influence equity performance for the foreseeable future. Events may unfold quickly given the pressure on the U.S. and China to avoid the economic threat of an escalating trade war.
Since hitting new all-time highs two weeks ago, the S&P 500 has fallen about 2.2% as trade negotiations with China hit this snag. Last week, the US announced new tariffs on Chinese imports. This morning, China announced new tariffs on some US goods. Many fear a widening trade war.
Don't get us wrong. We want free trade, and we understand the dangers of trade wars and tariffs (which are just taxes on consumers). At the same time, we think trade deficits themselves are not a reason for trade wars. We all run personal trade deficits with the local grocery store and benefit from that. Even if the entire world went to zero tariffs, the US would almost certainly still run trade deficits, even with China.
But today, the trade deficit with China is partly due to the fact that China has higher tariffs on imports than the US does – working to eliminate these lopsided tariffs is worthwhile.
In 1980, China was an impoverished nation. Then it began adopting tools of capitalism – property rights, markets, free prices and wages. Chinese businesses started to import the West's technology, and growth accelerated.
Initially, China didn't have to worry about intellectual property. When you replace oxen with a tractor, all you have to do is buy the tractor, not reinvent the internal combustion engine. But China has now picked, and benefited from, the lowest hanging fruit. So, China decided to steal the R&D of firms located abroad. Some estimates of this collective theft run into the hundreds of billions of dollars.
That's why normal free market and free trade principles don't neatly apply to China.
Remember President Reagan's old story supporting free trade? "We're in the same boat with our trading partners," Reagan said. "If one partner shoots a hole in the boat, does it make sense for the other one to shoot another hole in the boat?" The obvious answer is that it doesn't, and so our own protectionism would hurt us.
But China hasn't just shot a hole in the boat, they've become pirates. If Tony Soprano and his cronies robbed your house, would free market principles require you to trade with them to buy those items back? Of course not!
It's true tariff increases will not help the US economy. But $100 billion of tariffs spread over $14 trillion of consumer spending is not a recession inducing drag. It's true some business, like soybean farmers, are hurt. But the status quo means accepting hundreds of billions in theft from companies that are at the leading edge of future growth.
Either way, if tariffs nick our economy, China's gets hammered. Last year we exported $180 billion in goods and services to China, which is 0.9% of our GDP. Meanwhile, China exported $559 billion to the US, which is 4.6% of their economy. We have enormous economic leverage that they simply can't match.
An extended US-China trade battle means US companies will shift supply chains out of China and toward places like Singapore, Vietnam, Mexico, or "Made in the USA." If that happens, the Chinese economy is hurt for decades.
Anyone can invent a scenario where some sort of Smoot-Hawley-like global trade war happens. Realistically, though, that appears very unlikely. We're not the only advanced country China's piracy has victimized, and China may realize it's more isolated than it thought.In the end, China wants to trade with the West, not North Korea, Russia, and Venezuela. China needs the West. And all these trade war hysterics just aren't warranted.
Source: Pacific Global Investment Management Company
Chart reflects price changes, not total return. Because it does not include dividends or splits, it should not be used to benchmark performance of specific investments.
Latest News
China to Hit U.S. With Tariffs on $60 Billion in Goods Am...
That followed Trump's increase of duties on $200 billion of Chinese imports
Asia Markets: Asian stocks move lower Monday as markets r...
Shares were mostly lower in Asia on Monday after trade talks between the U.S. and China wrapped up Friday without an agreement.
JP Morgan: The US-China tariff battle is just the start o...
"I think we have to recognize as equity investors, in partificular, this is now the new normal," said James Sullivan, head of Asia ex-Japan equity research at J.P. Morgan.
